Harish uppal v. union of india
WebWrit Petition (civil) 132 of 1988 PETITIONER: Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal RESPONDENT: Union of India and another DATE OF JUDGMENT: 17/12/2002 BENCH: M.B. SHAH, D. M. DHARMADHIKARI JUDGMENT: J U D G M E N T WITH WP (C) Nos. 320 AND 394 OF 1993, WP (C) No. 821 OF 1990 AND WP (C) No.406 OF 2000 Shah, J. We fully agree … Web5 hours ago · 17 min read. In this series, Bar & Bench will bring you the top 15 judgments/orders delivered by the Supreme Court of India every two weeks. Below are our picks for the last two weeks of March 2024. 1. Section 37 NDPS Act should not be interpreted literally to render bail impossible: Supreme Court. Case Title: Mohd Muslim …
Harish uppal v. union of india
Did you know?
http://www.indianbarassociation.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/BAR-COUNCIL-OF-INDIA1.pdf WebAll of them have been considered in the judgment of a Constitution Bench of this Court in the case of Ex Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India ( 2003) 2 SCC 45 . In this case, the Court also noted the Page: 298directions, which were issued by this Court in the case of Common Cause, A Registered Society ( 2006) 9 SCC 304 , (1995) 1 Scale 6.
WebEx Capt. Harish Uppal Vs Union of India Case Whether Lawyers have Right to Strike Case WebEx. Capt. Harish Uppal V. Union Of India – Whether The Lawyers Have A Right To Strike. Court : Supreme Court of India. Brief : This is a landmark judgment in which the court …
WebSubsequently, the Chairman of the Bar Council of India addressed a communication dated 23.03.2024 to the respondent No.1 and a copy to the Hon’ble Chief Justice through the Registrar General. In terms of the said ... of Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal vs. Union of India and Another reported in WebMar 30, 1994 · The special leave petition is directed against an order of the Division Bench of the Delhi High Court dismissing the petitioner's writ petition summarily on two grounds, …
WebThis is a landmark judgment of the Supreme Court of India in which the question – “Whether the lawyers have a right to go on a strike?” was decided The parties to this case are : 1 Captain Harish Uppal- Petitioner 2 of India and another – Respondent Before coming to the facts of the case, let us understand the background of this case:
WebDecision in Ex. Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India Air 2003 SC 739 Whether a Right Decision in the Right Direction - Aironline - Administration of justice is one of the most … asahi kasei fibers italiaWebJul 6, 2014 · Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal V. Union Of India & Anr (4) July 6, 2014 by Lakhwinder Mattoo. Share this on WhatsApp. Previous Part (d) At taluka/Tehsil/Sub Divn, Senior most Judge, President or Presidents of the Bar Association, Government Pleader, representative of the State Bar Council, if any. asahi kasei germanyWebJul 20, 2024 · Harish Uppal vs Union of India on 17 December, 2002 The petitioner, in this case, was an ex-army officer. In 1972 petitioner was … asahi kasei medicalWebEx-Capt. Harish Uppal vs Union Of India & Anr on 17 December, 2002 Bench: Cji, Doraiswamy Raju, S. N. Variava, D. M. Dharmadhikari CASE NO.: Writ Petition (civil) … bang meltdownWebDec 30, 2024 · Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal V. Union of India, 2003 Aasim Yezdani - YouTube 0:00 / 3:09 Ex-Capt. Harish Uppal V. Union of India, 2003 Aasim Yezdani Exam Pressure 12K subscribers Join Subscribe 93... asahi kasei medical americaWebMar 31, 2024 · The observations in the case of Capt. Harish Uppal v. Union of India (supra) indicate that the proceedings inside the Court are always expected to be held which commands confidence of the public in the efficacy of the institution of the Courts. bangme bakeryWebEx. Capt. Harish Uppal vs. Union of India and another, AIR 2003 SC 739 and also the judgement of the Gujarat High Court in the case of Yatin Narendra Oza vs. High Court of Gujarat, AIR 2024 SC 5578, learned Advocate General submits that strike is not permissible in any manner and he is deadly against the said strike. asahi kasei hp